A Review Of trade secret case law
A Review Of trade secret case law
Blog Article
Because the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become attained, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) in the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The an abundance of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The law enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair to the offender as well as Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court together with from other courts However they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
The a good amount of this power casts an obligation around the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it really is made very clear that police is free to get action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities topic to regulation. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. In case the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and so they shall be assigned non-field duties while in the interim period. Read more
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), Obviously distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion will involve a transfer to some higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, within the other hand, gives financial relief by inserting an employee within a higher pay out scale, without shifting their task duties or position. It is a mechanism designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained while in the same fork out scale for a protracted time, particularly when they absence options for promotion. Upgradation can be a policy tool used to reduce the hardship of lengthy-term stagnation. Read more
These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Permit the decision stand"—is definitely the principle by which judges are bound to this kind of past decisions, drawing on recognized judicial authority to formulate their positions.
Within the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court is the highest court during the United States. Decrease courts over the federal level contain the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, and the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts listen to cases involving matters related towards the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that require parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Every state has its own judicial system that incorporates trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Each and every state is commonly referred to as the “supreme” court, Though there are a few exceptions to this rule, for example, the New York Court of Appeals or perhaps the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally listen to cases involving state constitutional matters, state law and regulations, Even though state courts may generally hear cases involving federal laws.
Various judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of a crime does not represent a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in placing the Petitioner's name within the ECL based on the criminal case are inconsistent with proven legal principles. Therefore, this petition must be allowed Read more
Summaries offer concise insights into the legal principles governing agreements between parties, including the formation, interpretation, and enforceability of contracts, furnishing a useful resource for understanding contractual rights and obligations.
The law of necessity identified and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it was the illegal action called legislation of necessity..
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance in the respondents that pensionary benefits might be withheld on account of the allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section twenty from the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does supply for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These include things like if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension might be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension might be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's check here pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established via the government.
The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information for being gathered by the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
eight. To the reasons stated over, this court finds the petition to generally be without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend within the comments, and their request is So acceded to. All pending applications, if any, also are dismissed. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is usually a properly-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is topic to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.